Crossing borders to change lives: Surgical mission amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID pandemic, elective global surgical missions were temporarily halted for the safety of patients and travelling healthcare providers. We discuss our experience during our first surgical mission amidst the pandemic. We report a safe and successful treatment of the patients, detailing our precautionary steps and outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective manual chart review and data collection of patients' charts was conducted after IRB approval. We entail our experience and safety steps followed during screening, operating and postoperative care to minimize exposure and improve outcomes during a surgical mission in an outpatient setting during the pandemic. The surgical mission was from February 8 to February 12, 2022. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients who were screened. 33 patients underwent surgical intervention. One patient required postoperative hospitalization for a biliary duct leak. No patient or healthcare provider tested positive for COVID at the end of the mission. The average age of patients was 46.9 years. The average operative time was 116 min, and all patients had local nerve blocks. It included 45 health work providers. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to perform outpatient international surgery during the pandemic while following pre-selected precautions.

The First COVID-19 Pandemic Wave and the Effect on Health Care Trainees: A National Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: This study observes the trends and patterns among trainees during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and their response to resident education and hospital/program support. METHODS: An anonymous online 31-question survey was distributed to medical students and postgraduate year residents. Topics included were demographics, clinical responsibilities, educational/curricula changes, and trainee wellness. Descriptive analysis was performed for each set of demographic groupings as well as 2 and 3 group comparisons. RESULTS: Total 1051 surveys collected, 930 used for analysis: 373 (40.1%) male, 434 (46.6%) aged 30-34 years, 588 (63.2%) white, 417 (44.8%) married, 168 (18%) with children, and 323 (34.7%) from the Northeast region. The Northeast experienced difficulty sleeping, feelings of guilt, hopelessness, and changes in appetite (P = .0077). The pandemic interfered significantly with relationships and living situations (P < .0001). Trainees 18-34 years believed the pandemic affected residency training (P < .0001). Surgical residents were concerned about reaching numbers of operative procedures to graduate (P < .0001). Residency programs adhered to ACGME work restrictions (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We aim to provide continued educational support for our trainees' clinical development and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and the Injured Patient: A Multicenter Review.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to affect outcomes among surgical patients. We hypothesized that COVID-19 would be linked to higher mortality and longer length of stay of trauma patients regardless of the injury severity score (ISS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of trauma registries from two level 1 trauma centers (suburban and urban) from March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019, and March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020, comparing baseline characteristics and cumulative adverse events. Data collected included ISS, demographics, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was time from hospitalization to in-hospital death. Outcomes during the height of the first New York COVID-19 wave were also compared with the same time frame in the prior year. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1180 trauma patients admitted during the study period from March 2020 to June 2020. Of these, 596 were never tested for COVID-19 and were excluded from the analysis. A total of 148 COVID+ patients and 436 COVID- patients composed the 2020 cohort for analysis. Compared with the 2019 cohort, the 2020 cohort was older with more associated comorbidities, more adverse events, but lower ISS. Higher rates of historical hypertension, diabetes, neurologic events, and coagulopathy were found among COVID+ patients compared with COVID- patients. D-dimer and ferritin were unreliable indicators of COVID-19 severity; however, C-reactive protein levels were higher in COVID+ relative to COVID- patients. Patients who were COVID+ had a lower median ISS compared with COVID- patients, and COVID+ patients had higher rates of mortality and longer length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: COVID+ trauma patients admitted to our two level 1 trauma centers had increased morbidity and mortality compared with admitted COVID- trauma patients despite age and lower ISS. C-reactive protein may play a role in monitoring COVID-19 activity in trauma patients. A better understanding of the physiological impact of COVID-19 on injured patients warrants further investigation.

Incidence and effects of deep vein thrombosis on the outcome of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur at different rates in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Limited data exist regarding comparisons with non-COVID-19 patients with similar characteristics. Our objective was to compare the rates of DVT in patients with and without COVID-19 and to determine the effect of DVT on the outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study at a single-institution, level 1 trauma center comparing patients with and without COVID-19. The 573 non-COVID-19 patients (age, 61 ± 17 years; 44.9% male) had been treated from March 20, 2019 to June 30, 2019, and the 213 COVID-19 patients (age, 61 ± 16 years; 61.0% male) had been treated during the same interval in 2020. Standard prophylactic anticoagulation therapy consisted of 5000 U of heparin three times daily for the medical patients without COVID-19 who were not in the intensive care unit (ICU). The ICU, surgical, and trauma patients without COVID-19 had received 40 mg of enoxaparin daily (not adjusted to weight). The patients with COVID-19 had also received enoxaparin 40 mg daily (also not adjusted to weight), regardless of whether treated in the ICU. The two primary outcomes were the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the COVID-19 group vs that in the historic control and the effect of DVT on mortality. The subgroup analyses included patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary embolism (PE), and intensive care unit patients (ICU). RESULTS: The rate of DVT and PE for the non-COVID-19 patients was 12.4% (71 of 573) and 3.3% (19 of 573) compared with 33.8% (72 of 213) and 7.0% (15 of 213) for the COVID-19 patients, respectively. Unprovoked PE had developed in 10 of 15 COVID-19 patients (66.7%) compared with 8 of 497 non-COVID-19 patients (1.6%). The 60 COVID-19 patients with ARDS had had an incidence of DVT of 46.7% (n = 28). In contrast, the incidence of DVT for the 153 non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS was 28.8% (n = 44; P = .01). The COVID-19 patients requiring the ICU had had an increased rate of DVT (39 of 90; 43.3%) compared with the non-COVID-19 patients (33 of 123; 33.3%; P = .01). The risk factors for mortality included age, DVT, multiple organ failure syndrome, and prolonged ventilatory support with the following odd ratios: 1.030 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.058), 2.847 (95% CI, 1.356-5.5979), 4.438 (95% CI, 1.973-9.985), and 5.321 (95% CI, 1.973-14.082), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DVT for COVID-19 patients receiving standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation that was not weight adjusted was high, especially for ICU patients. DVT is one of the factors contributing to increased mortality. These results suggest a reevaluation is necessary of the present standard-dose thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19.

Management of mass casualties due to COVID-19: handling the dead.

A high number of fatalities can occur during major disasters or during events like the COVID-19 pandemic. In a natural disaster, the dead must be removed from disaster sites while rescue work is in progress; otherwise, the health and safety of the community are threatened. The COVID-19 pandemic is analogous to a natural disaster with mass casualties where the disaster sites are hospitals with morgues that are overwhelmed. As the number of the deceased rise rapidly and hospital morgues are at their full capacity, hospitals use what is called a Body Collection Point (BCP). BCP is defined as a temporary refrigeration unit used to store decedents until transport is arranged. Decedents should always be handled in a manner denoting respect, and provisions and management of resources should be properly mobilized to ensure this. Contingency plans must be created to prepare for worsening of the disaster that further overwhelms the capacity of the health care systems.

Prone ventilation as treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19.

Prone ventilation refers to the delivery of mechanical ventilation with the patient lying in the prone position. The improvement of oxygenation during prone ventilation is multifactorial, but occurs mainly by reducing lung compression and improving lung perfusion. CT imaging modeling data demonstrated that the asymmetry of lung shape leads to a greater induced pleural pressure gravity gradient when supine as compared to prone positioning. Although proning is indicated in patients with severe ARDS who are not responding to other ventilator modalities, this technique has moved away from a salvage therapy for refractory hypoxemia to an upfront lung-protective strategy intended to improve survival in severe ARDS, especially due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. In view of different roles, we surgeons had to take during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is of importance to learn how to implement this therapeutic measure, especially in a surgical critical care unit setting. As such, this article aims to review the physiological principles and effects of the prone ventilation, positioning, as well as its contraindications and complications.